Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Insurance Coverage for Summer Storm Damage

“If my home is damaged by a summer storm, will my insurance cover repairs?”

By Sandra Block, Kiplinger.com

Where water-related damage is concerned, the answer depends on whether the water came from above or below. In general, if the damage was caused by wind-driven rain that came in through your roof, windows or doors, your insurance will cover the cost of repairs.

But if the damage is caused by flooding, a far more common problem during storm season, your homeowners insurance will not cover it. The only way to protect yourself from flood-related damage is to buy flood insurance from the federal National Flood Insurance Program. Premiums range from about $200 a year to more than $2,000, depending on your area’s risk of flooding.

Never assume you don’t need flood insurance just because you don’t live in a coastal area. In 2011, torrential rainfall from Hurricane Irene caused widespread flooding throughout the Northeast. Vermont was hard hit, and many of the victims didn’t have flood insurance. “A lot of Vermont residents never thought they’d be involved in major flooding,” says Richard McGrath, chief executive of McGrath Insurance Group, in Sturbridge, Mass.
You can purchase federal flood insurance through a local insurance agent. Don’t wait until storm clouds gather to buy a policy; typically, there’s a 30-day waiting period before premiums take effect. For price quotes, go to FloodSmart.gov.

Sewage backup. If heavy rains overwhelm your storm-water system, sewage could back up into your house—an expensive and unpleasant mess. Most standard homeowners policies don’t include sewage-backup coverage, but you can purchase a rider that will pay for $10,000 to $20,000 of damages for about $50 to $75 a year, McGrath says.

Damage from trees. Old-growth trees lose their charm in a hurry when lightning, wind or heavy rain knocks them down. If the tree hits your house, garage or other insured structure, the damage is usually covered by your homeowners insurance, says Jeanne Salvatore, spokeswoman for the Insurance Information Institute.

Damage from a neighbor’s tree—or even from one a block away that was uprooted in a windstorm—is also usually covered. If your insurer believes your neighbor contributed to the problem by failing to take care of the tree, it may try to collect against your neighbor’s policy, Salvatore says. In that case, you could get a break on all or part of your deductible. But it works both ways: If your tree damages your neighbor’s property, you could be held responsible. Your insurer could refuse to cover damage to your property if it believes you were negligent.
Most policies won’t pay to remove a tree that falls in your yard but doesn’t hit anything—although you may be eligible for some coverage if the fallen tree blocks your driveway or prevents you from getting into your house.

Get a tax break? You may be able to recover some of the costs your insurance doesn’t reimburse when you file your taxes.

Losses from hurricanes, floods and other disasters that aren’t covered by your policy are deductible, if you itemize your deductions. You won’t be able to deduct the entire amount of your losses, however. First, you’ll have to reduce the amount of your loss by $100. Then, you can deduct only the amount that exceeds 10% of your adjusted gross income. For example, if you suffered $20,000 in unreimbursed losses and your AGI is $100,000, you would subtract $100, then subtract $10,000 (10% of your AGI) from the $19,900 balance, bringing your deduction to $9,900.

Reprinted with permission. All Contents ©2014 The Kiplinger Washington Editors. Kiplinger.com.

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

In 2009, rates jumped about .250% leading into Memorial Day and then they jumped an additional .500% the week of Memorial Day. Last year rates jumped from 3.5ish in May to 4.00% in June and then 4.50% in July. OK so we have skated through most of May and rates have held in so I am happy! Today, rates are exactly where they were on Friday. An FHA 30 Year fixed rate with no points is at 3.750% (5.690APR) and a conventional loan with 20% down and no points is currently at 4.125% (4.198APR) assuming your buyer has a 740 credit score.

We touched a little on Capital Gains last week and I wanted to go a little more into depth on this. I will start with some basic stuff and work my way into the more complicated information a little later. If a person purchases a property and then sells it for a profit this could constitute a capital gain. If they lived in that house for two of the past 5 years and the gain was less than $250,000.00 for a single person or $500,000.00 for a couple then they would be exempt from taxes. Pretty simple stuff. The end!! Not so fast! About 80% of our clients will fit into that mold. While 20% will make over the exemption, or sell before the two years. So let's look at those clients a little more carefully and how can they get out of their house before two years and minimize the gains.
    • So if a client buys for $400K and sells for 500K is the gain $100K? The answer to that is no.
    • We need to ask what their expenses were going in? Closing costs, escrow title, loan fees...
    • What was the cost of the improvements they did? Kitchen, bath, roof, landscape...
    • What are the selling costs to sell the property?
Depending on improvements, those fees may or may not add up to 100K, but all of the money they spent will be deducted from their profits and they would only pay taxes on the remaining profit. We always have our clients consult with their tax person when they are looking to sell. It is imperative that they know what the real cost is to sell a property before they sell it.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if you have any clients that have any questions on loans or anything to do with Real Estate.
Thank you for your time and remember to always align yourself with the best in the business! That will make your business the best!

Sincerely,
Mike Meena
Augusta Financial

Monday, May 19, 2014

Regulators Seek to Ease Housing Credit:

Both the new regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as the secretary of Housing and Urban Development, announced they would shift strategies by making credit more available to homeowners. 

Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Mel Watt, who recently took over the job of regulator for the mortgage giants, said in his first public comments that he would not lower the maximum loan limits for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which currently stand at $417,000 in most markets. Watt's predecessor, Edward DeMarco, had contemplated the move as a way to shrink Fannie and Freddie's footprint in the mortgage market.

Watt, a former North Carolina congressman, also said he would try to alleviate some of the uncertainty banks face in dealing with Fannie and Freddie.

"I know that repurchase risk remains a top concern for the mortgage industry. Lenders believe that too much uncertainty still exists in this area for them to ease their credit overlays. Ultimately, this undermines the goal of improving access to mortgage credit for creditworthy borrowers," he said.

In another move to open up credit to first-time homebuyers specifically, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan announced a new four-year pilot program at the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) starting this fall. The FHA is the government mortgage insurer for low down payment loans.

Under the program, first-time homebuyers who commit to credit counseling will qualify for reduced FHA insurance premiums on their loans. For the average FHA loan balance of $180,000—these reductions, according to Donovan, can add up to roughly $10,000 in savings over the life of the loan. 

Monday, May 5, 2014

Buying Beats Renting After Just Two Years in Half of Metro Areas:

Prospective homeowners face a pleasing condition: In half of U.S. metropolitan areas, buying now beats renting after a mere two years.

"Rents keep rising, and mortgage rates remain very low, which is helping to skew the rent vs. buy decision toward buying for those who can afford it," said Stan Humphries, chief economist for Zillow.com, the housing and mortgage firm behind a rent-versus-own study,

Two years is a surprisingly short time to make a home purchase pay off. For many years, the rule of thumb was that you must own a home for four or five years to break even . It takes that long for the home's rising value to offset the various costs, including title insurance and realtor's commission, incurred in the purchase and sale. Renting makes more sense for anyone who does not expect to stay in the home beyond the break-even period.

But prospective buyers benefit from the lower prices. And low mortgage rates allow them to keep their monthly costs down. At the same time, high demand has pushed rents up very fast in many communities. The higher the rent, the sooner owning pays off. Finally, low-interest earnings on safe savings such as bank accounts reduce the gains renters can enjoy on cash that is saved instead of being put into a down payment on a home.

"Among the 35 largest metro areas analyzed by Zillow in the first quarter, those with the shortest breakeven horizon were Riverside (less than 1 year), Orlando (1 year), Tampa (1.1 years) and Miami-Fort Lauderdale (1.2 years)," Zillow said, referring to locations in California and Florida. "Large metros with the longest breakeven horizon included Washington, D.C. (4.2 years), Boston (4 years), Phoenix (3.3 years), San Diego (3.2 years), Minneapolis and Baltimore (both 3.1 years)."

Zillow cautions that break-even periods can vary considerably within any given city.